An Interview with Computing Pioneer Alan Kay
An Interview with Computing Pioneer Alan Kay
Article by http://www.Batteryer.Co.Uk : Born into 1940, CPU scientist Alan Curtis Kay is single of a handful of visionaries a large amount dependable meant for the concepts which give propelled private computing ahead terminated the times of yore thirty years — and surely the a large amount quotable single.
He’s the guy who assumed with the intention of “The top way to predict the imminent is to invent it” and with the intention of “Technology is no matter which with the intention of wasn’t around as soon as you were born” and with the intention of “If you don’t fail by the side of smallest amount 90 percent of the calculate, you’re not aiming elevated sufficient.” And as soon as I leading proverb Microsoft‘s float up tablet keep on June, a Kay maxim helped me understand it: “People who are really serious going on for software must sort their own hardware.”
Over all, however, Kay is well-known meant for the Dynabook — his decades-old farsightedness of a portable suite of hardware, software, indoctrination tools and services which would add up to the ultimate creative upbringing meant for kids of all ages. Each current portable CPU reflects elements of the Dynabook idea — the single Laptop for every outcome project’s XO over all others — and yet not any of them give fully realized the idea which Kay was lettering going on for into the ahead of schedule 1970s.
In fact, Kay says with the intention of particular gadgets with superficial Dynabook-like qualities, such equally the iPad, give not individual botched to realize the Dynabook hallucinate, but give into particular senses betrayed it. That’s single of the points he makes into this interview, conducted by CPU historian David Greelish, owner of the Classic Computing Blog and organizer of this month’s Vintage CPU Festival Southeast into Atlanta. (The Festival want be included a pop-up Apple museum featuring Xerox’s inventive Alto workstation, which Kay worked on, equally well equally diplomacy which acutely reflected his influence, plus the Lisa, the imaginative Macintosh and the Newton.)
Kay and Greelish moreover discuss Kay’s experiences by the side of particular of the lofty outfits everywhere he’s worked, plus Xerox’s imaginary PARC labs, Apple, Disney and HP. Now, Kay continues his follow a line of investigation going on for children and equipment by the side of his own organization, the Viewpoints follow a line of investigation Institute.
–Harry McCracken
David Greelish: Sort out you harmonize with the intention of we at present in effect give the Dynabook, equally articulated into the three tiers of current private computing; the notebook, tablet and smartphone? If not, what did you say? Vital skin texture sort out you go out with missing from these? Give they delivered on the contract of humanizing education?
Alan Kay: I give been asked versions of this question meant for the keep on twenty years otherwise so. Ninety-five percent of the Dynabook appreciation was a “service conception,” and five percent had to sort out with mean forms, of which individual single — the slim notebook — is commonly into the civic opinion. (The other two were an extrapolated version of Ivan Sutherland’s top mounted put on show, and an extrapolated version of Nicholas Negroponte’s ideas going on for ever-present computers embedded and networked the world over.)
Into order to parley going on for the service appreciation, I commonly specifically stick with the lowest amount with the intention of had to survive delivered (even though a inordinate wish back into the ’60s was with the intention of AI would progress sufficient to allow “helpful agents” — equally into [pioneering CPU scientist John] McCarthy’s “Advice Taker” — to survive a column of the user-interface experience). We imaginary the overlapping window, icons, and that., graphical-user interface by the side of PARC and specifically concentrated on it as soon as it became vindicate with the intention of the “helpful agent” wasn’t vacant to fair up into the decade of the ’70s (and still hasn’t).
The out of the ordinary point going on for this question is with the intention of it is quite vindicate from the several ahead of schedule documents with the intention of it was an secondary use meant for the Dynabook to survive able to simulate all existing media into an editable/authorable form into a highly portable networked (including wireless) form. The central use was meant for it to survive able to qualitatively widen the notions of “reading, lettering, sharing, publishing, and that. Of ideas” literacy to include the “computer analysis, lettering, sharing, publishing of ideas” with the intention of is the computer’s special province.
Meant for all media, the imaginative intent was “symmetric authoring and consuming”.
Isn’t it precious stone vindicate with the intention of this keep on and a large amount worthy service is quite not there into today’s computing meant for the all-purpose civic? Apple with the iPad and iPhone goes even more and does not allow children to download an Etoy made by an added outcome somewhere into the planet. This may possibly not survive farther from the imaginative intentions of the complete ARPA-IPTO/PARC group of people into the ’60s and ’70s.
Apple’s reasons meant for this are mostly bogus, and to the amount with the intention of security is an publish, what did you say? Is insecure are the OSes supplied by the vendors (and the insecurities are the consequence of their own bad practices — they are not necessary).
Sort out our current private computing diplomacy augment education? Give they lived up to what did you say? Was foreseen into the times of yore? Are they really portion teachers teach into the classroom?
The perspective on this is leading to ask whether the current edifying practices are even using books into a powerful and educative way. Otherwise even to ask whether the classroom process with no slightly special media by the side of all is educative.
I would say, to a distressing amount, the answer is “no.”
The education institution into the U.S. Has commonly treated the CPU (a) leading equally undesirable and shunned it, (b) equally sort of like a typewriter, (c) not equally a bargain basement priced but minus legible textbook with less significant pages, and that. (d) equally something meant for AP trying, (e) has not ventured into what did you say? Is special going on for computing with reference to modeling ideas and portion to think going on for them.
This into ill feeling of pioneers such equally Seymour Papert explaining both into all-purpose (and quite a speck specifically) specifically what did you say? It is and how it can reform education.
I’ve used the analogy of what did you say? Would materialize if you position a piano into each classroom. If here is thumbs down other context, you want comprehend a “chopsticks” culture, and maybe even a pop culture. And this is pretty much what did you say? Is experience.
Into other terms, “the melody is not into the piano”.
Tags : Alan Kay,CPU,Pioneer,apple,ipad
からの記事：Lenovo 0A36286
Lenovo ThinkPad L412バッテリー
Related: http://batteryjp02.cocolog-nifty.com/
